[Bkn-english-646-fall-2009] Fw: Re: Assignment #4
alicia berbenick
aberbenick at gmail.com
Tue Oct 6 16:55:51 EDT 2009
Hi guys,
No, to clarify, I was simply trying to point out that I have noticed myself
imposing my own methods of writing on others - without even giving a thought
to the fact that people learn to group and organize ideas in many different
ways. Reading about other methods in this chapter gave me some ideas. Sorry
that I must have came off as a "labeler" of people.
Alicia
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:35 PM, John Casquarelli <jcas888 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- On *Tue, 10/6/09, John Casquarelli <jcas888 at yahoo.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: John Casquarelli <jcas888 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Bkn-english-646-fall-2009] Assignment #4
> To: "anthony eid" <anthonyeid1986 at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 7:34 PM
>
> I agree with you Tony. Far too often it feels like academe prescribes
> learning systems that fit neatly in a box, allowing little creative
> diversity both from the perspective of the student and the teacher. Not
> that any of the systems descibed in the book are not effective (I have used
> a couple myself when tutoring), but people can learn how to write in any
> number of ways (some not so concrete). In addition, as I have experienced
> first hand in the short time that I've worked at the writing center, ESL
> students bring another element to the equation of writing (learning to write
> in different ways because of culture, etc.), and how many of us try to teach
> writing.
>
> --- On *Tue, 10/6/09, anthony eid <anthonyeid1986 at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: anthony eid <anthonyeid1986 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Bkn-english-646-fall-2009] Assignment #4
> To: "Alicia Berbenick" <aberbenick at gmail.com>
> Cc: bkn-english-646-fall-2009 at lists-1.liu.edu
> Date: Tuesday, October 6, 2009, 3:32 PM
>
> I didn't like how the author prescribed specific methods to specific
> learners. I think it would have worked better to vaguely allude to the
> learners and not display them connected so concretely. For me, it is not
> learners but situations that guide my sessions. Students are multi-faceted
> bundles of writing history. Once you uncover one method that works to one
> issue that same issue may pop up and the method you used may be ineffective.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Alicia Berbenick <aberbenick at gmail.com<http://us.mc458.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=aberbenick@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
>> Here you are all!
>> Alicia
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009 mailing list
>> BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009 at lists-1.liu.edu<http://us.mc458.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009@lists-1.liu.edu>
>> https://lists-1.liu.edu/mailman/listinfo/bkn-english-646-fall-2009
>>
>>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009 mailing list
> BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009 at lists-1.liu.edu<http://us.mc458.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009@lists-1.liu.edu>
> https://lists-1.liu.edu/mailman/listinfo/bkn-english-646-fall-2009
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009 mailing list
> BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009 at lists-1.liu.edu
> https://lists-1.liu.edu/mailman/listinfo/bkn-english-646-fall-2009
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists-1.liu.edu/pipermail/bkn-english-646-fall-2009/attachments/20091006/24a80397/attachment-0001.html
More information about the BKN-ENGLISH-646-FALL-2009
mailing list