<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3627" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=role_body style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 topMargin=7 rightMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>
<DIV>Chapter seven, I feel, was just much better than some of the previous and
more direct--more useful. I find the two types of comments very helpful in
working with students/tutees. Do people feel/think we should have a
handout of some sort that has the basic proofreader marks to at least narrow
down the ambiguity of some professors' commentary? Otherwise, we can
definitely work on the "in-progress" markings and if students want to know
specific notes they (and/or we) may speak directly with the
professors.<BR><BR>Yani: You speak of the infamous red ink and I agree with
you. But I must add, seeing it from the students' perspective, red symbolizes
danger. Whenever marking papers/essays, I use green ink (since lead
smudges) because it symbolizes hope--or at least doesn't make the paper
bleed!</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>